How this works

We will release a movie every ten days beginning with Birth of a Nation (1915) and then jumping to the 1920's where we will release one new movie for each year within the decade. Our goal is to work our way from the 20's to the present while gaining insight into the evolution of film. All the movies we choose will be available through Netflix. The basic idea is to build a community of like-minded film fans and connect them with a forum for discussion. Without futher ado...it's time to Cinema Cram!

3/30/10

Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ Reviews

girl by locker says:
You know, I have realized that I don’t really like epic movies that much. I understand the purpose of them and they can be quite impressive, but overall I just don’t love them as a film genre. In the silent version of Ben Hur, Ramon Novarro is prone to some serious over-acting as the lead character Ben Hur and Francis Bushman wore way too much lipstick for me to take seriously as the Roman conqueror Messala.

However, there were scenes that literally blew me away, and I suspect if I did some research they would be talked about scenes in other reviews as well. First, we have the scenes in which Ben Hur is a galley slave. The enormity of the ships, the precision of the slaves rowing and then the intense battle scene that breaks out between the pirates and the Romans is truly spectacular.

There is also the famous chariot race scene which really is worth all the hype. Fred Niblo did an amazing job directing it all. I wondered a lot about how they filmed all the people in the coliseum. It’s not like they could use computer generated people to fill in and make it appear as though there were more spectators than reality. I also imagined sitting in a theater in 1926 witnessing the race for the first time on the big screen, literally on the edge of my seat from all the excitement. Yes, it was exciting even though you know Ben Hur defeats his nemesis Messala.

Overall, what I enjoyed most about Ben Hur were the sets. They were lavish and, well, epic. I give it 3 out of 5 stars on Netflix.


Juror #3 says:

If the 1959 remake of Ben-Hur is supposed to be the "classic" then I can not wait to watch it.  I'll start this review with the only negative thing I have to say - the last half hour of the movie, although emotionally dramatic, drags on too long,  But this may be due to the fact that the climax of the film, the famous chariot race, is so edge-of-your-seat good that anything after it seems, well, boring.  The movie takes place during the time of Christ and begins at his birth.  Ben-Hur is a Jewish prince that accidentally injures a high-ranking Roman and is betrayed by a Roman friend - the consequence which is a life sentence to work in the galley's, and separation from his mother and sister.  That's the set-up to this epic tale which leads Ben-Hur to a life in search of vengeance.  Along the way he finds love, courage, and honor eventually leading to the vengeance he so badly yearned.  


Ben-Hur is an amazing story with poetic dialogue boards and unbelievable action.  I kept wondering how in the world they filmed something like this in 1925.  Wasn't it dangerous?  Was this the first movie with "film tricks"?  So I looked it up and here is what Wikipedia had to say:  Ben-Hur is the most expensive silent film ever made.  Shooting began in Italy in 1923, starting two years of difficulties, accidents, and eventually a move back to Hollywood.  When filming the chariot scene, the drivers were careful and slow, which disappointed the Producer.  To make it more exciting, he offered $100 to the winner, and the resulting heated competition led to the horrendous crash that remains in the movie.  Several horses were killed during the production.  That and another fatal accident led to the changes in rules of filming and film safety.  So there you have it.  


The other interesting element of the film is the portrayal of Christ which is intertwined throughout, maybe a little too heavily in the end.  My guess is that the 1959 version will have omitted much of this, but it was an important part of explaining Ben-Hur's enduring strength - he was living to help a chosen leader save his people.  One last thing - Christ is never actually fully shown on-screen which adds to his mystique and power, a fantastic choice by the Director.  Considering when this movie was made I can't help but give it 5/5 stars and eagerly await the viewing of the 1959 version.  

3/22/10

Film 8: Ben-Hur: A tale of the Christ (1926)

Netflix Summary: Before William Wyler's grand epic, this 1925 silent version of Ben-Hur stunned audiences with lavish sets and a spectacular chariot race. An orchestral score from acclaimed Hollywood composer Carl Davis is added to this version of Fred Niblo's Ben-Hur, which became the third-highest-grossing silent film of all time. 


IMDB Plot summary: Erstwhile childhood friends, Judah Ben-Hur and Messala meet again as adults, this time with Roman officer Messala as conqueror and Judah as a wealthy, though conquered, Israelite. A slip of a brick during a Roman parade causes Judah to be sent off as a galley slave, his property confiscated and his mother and sister imprisoned. Years later, as a result of his determination to stay alive and his willingness to aid his Roman master, Judah returns to his homeland an exalted and wealthy Roman athlete. Unable to find his mother and sister, and believing them dead, he can think of nothing else than revenge against Messala.


Film viewing date:  3/31/10




Next film released: 4/01/10

Gold Rush Reviews

girl by locker says:

I finally get why everyone loves Charlie Chaplin. Simply put – he’s amazing. He is a talented actor, writer, and director capable of making exceptional, poignant, hilarious and concise movies. Gold Rush, at just over an hour, was perfect in every way. We have watched some movies that felt as though they would never end (Iron Horse, for example) and I feel as though it is better to have an hour long stellar movie versus three hours filled with close-ups of chickens clucking around the farm. I question whether those scenes really add to the movie.


As a side note, this was the first talking movie that we have seen though, for my part at least, it wasn’t intentional. The movie was originally distributed as a silent film and Chaplin, in later years, went back and put talking in the movie. I wanted to watch the original but somehow managed to get the talking version. Instead of inserting written cards between scenes Chaplin narrates and includes bursts of dialogue from time to time, in particular with the action sequences. We are still many years away from Quentin Tarantino snappy dialogue, but it was cool to see how it all begins.

While I love The Kid more than Gold Rush¸ I still give it five stars (out of 5). I now have the desire to watch every Chaplin movie possible.

Juror #3 says:
I can say with the utmost certainty that Charlie Chaplin deserves his place in cinema history. I can't get over how funny and touching his movies are. Not only does he display his comedic genius in his films, but also a remarkable sense of humanity. It's his brilliant blending of these two qualities that make his films stand the test of time. The Gold Rush exhibits all these elements and, although I didn't enjoy it as much as The Kid, I wasn't bored for a second and would highly recommend it. His scenes with the beautiful Georgia tug at your heartstrings - they, in fact, made me look at myself. They made me turn inward and think about my own shallow nature, my ego. This from a Chaplin movie.


My proclamation:

I, Juror #3, hereby affirm my respect and admiration for Charlie Chaplin, and announce to the masses on Cinema Cram that I will host a Charlie Chaplin marathon at my home at some point in 2010.

His films are too good. I need to see more.

I rate The Gold Rush 3/5 stars.

3/11/10

Film 7: The Gold Rush (1925)

Netflix Summary: Charlie Chaplin's comic masterpiece centers on the hardships of life on the Alaskan frontier. The Little Tramp plays a pathetic, lonely prospector who journeys to the Klondike hoping to discover gold and make his fortune. Instead, he gets mixed up with some burly characters and falls in love with the beautiful Georgia (Georgia Hale).

Filmsite.org review: The Gold Rush (1925) is the quintessential Chaplin/Little Tramp film, with a balance of slapstick comedy and pantomime, social satire, and emotional and dramatic moments of tenderness. It was Chaplin's own personal favorite film, that showcases the classic Tramp character (referred to as "The Little Fellow" in the re-release version) as a romantic idealist and lone gold prospector at the turn of the century, with his cane, derby, distinctive walk, tight shabby suit, and mustache. http://www.filmsite.org/gold.html


Film viewing date: 3/21/10


Next film released 3/22/10

Iron Horse Reviews

Juror #3 says:

The more time I take to think about this film, the more I like it. It's an epic telling of an epic story. John Ford was known to be a director that could capture a moment's complete human experience. And it is just that skill that makes The Iron Horse a special film. There were scenes that seemed to be input for comic relief or a quick side-message and it annoyed me as I knew the film was 2 1/2 hours long, and I just wanted to move forward with the story line. However it became apparent to me after viewing several of these "types" of scenes that what Ford was actually doing was conveying the culture of the time. The movie tells the story of the creation of the transcontinental railroad - it is action-packed with battles between indians and railway workers, it has a love interest, and revenge story line. Intertwined through the action are these glimpses into the culture of the time which greatly adds to the story. The structure of the movie is consistent with epics today. I guess I'll agree with the historians, John Ford had a gift. 4/5 stars.

girl by locker says:

I actually liked Iron Horse. Between a damaged DVD and life throwing a lot at me (sorry for posting so late!), I had to watch the movie in bits and pieces. In the end, however, I was very happy I made it through. (There is a minor plot spoiler below - nothing, however, that you don’t see in the first 15 minutes of a 3 hour movie).


Iron Horse is a romantic and nostalgic view of the American West and the building of the first transcontinental railroad. It is a true epic starting with Davy Brandon as a boy setting off on the trail with his father and growing to a young man determined to see his father’s vision of the “road” completed. We have love, revenge, humor and, of course, action sequences with those blasted Indians trying to save their way of life. Early movies were definitely not PC.

There are a couple aspects that struck me: 1) In modern times, I think most of us would agree that Abraham Lincoln is one of our beloved presidents. What I have noticed in this movie as well as others we have watched, is that he was also very dear to the public back in the day. Iron Horse is actually dedicated to Lincoln and there is an obvious love and respect for him. I assumed the love came later in history. 2) Davy’s father is killed by a 2-fingered man and Davy spends the rest of his life looking for him. Can we say Princess Bride? When they finally meet I could almost hear, “My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.” 3) My only other knowledge of railroad construction comes from Blazing Saddles, and comparing the two movies (if they are historically accurate which I am assuming they are – more or less), I still can’t get over how back-breaking and labor intensive the work is. Not to mention, a large portion of the railroad tracks were built by Chinese. We don’t give them enough credit.

Overall, I give this movie 3 stars (out of 5). Admittedly, I had a lot going on but I deduct a star for being 3 hours and having to watch it in bits and pieces.